Item Details


Marine Fish Passage—Underappreciated Threats to Connectivity Within the Marine Environment Association LOGRAMI http://zotero.org/users/237438 http://zotero.org/users/237438/items/RRMMJA3A 2025-01-20T14:18:18Z 2025-01-20T14:18:18Z RRMMJA3A 21363 journalArticle Lennox et al. 2025 2
Item Type Journal Article
Author Robert J. Lennox
Author Kim Birnie-Gauvin
Author Caitlin Bate
Author Steven J. Cooke
Author Tormod Haraldstad
Author Saron Berhe
Author Heather D. Penney
Author Charles W. Bangley
Author Knut Wiik Vollset
Author Morgan L. Piczak
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/maec.12859
Volume 46
Issue 1
Pages e12859
Publication Marine Ecology
ISSN 1439-0485
Date 2025
Extra _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/maec.12859
DOI 10.1111/maec.12859
Accessed 2025-01-20 14:18:18
Library Catalog Wiley Online Library
Language en
Abstract Habitat fragmentation is a major threat to aquatic biodiversity loss. However, much of the focus is on the connectivity of freshwaters, with much less attention given to marine ecosystems. We contend that coastal infrastructure including bridges, causeways, tidal turbines, land infilling and harbours, wharfs, quays, piers and docks have resulted in underappreciated impacts on the connectivity of fish movements resulting in passage challenges at sea. For each type of marine infrastructure, we synthesised the present status of knowledge to characterise the problems and future challenges and also identify mitigation options and passage solutions to restore connectivity for fishes. Bridges can disrupt currents, generate light and noise/vibration, and emit electromagnetic signals, so more work is needed to modify in-water designs to minimise the negative impacts on fishes. Causeways involve infilling, resulting in full in-water barriers, requiring fishes to circumnavigate these structures and there is limited research on mitigation (e.g., fishways). Tidal turbines are placed in areas with high currents, which can hinder movements and result in entrainment; however, monitoring fish movements is challenging in these unique areas. Offshore energy has grown in recent years and can impact fish connectivity via altered sediment dynamics and water currents, as well as through the generation of noise pollution and electromagnetic fields. Land filling results not only in habitat loss but also in fragmentation, and it will be imperative to identify important habitats and corridors to minimise impacts there. Finally, infrastructure associated with boats (e.g., harbours, docks) negatively impacts nearshore habitat, which can alter movement trajectories. In the collective, we found evidence that diverse types of marine infrastructure can impact connectivity and, ultimately, fish movement and migrations. Interestingly,bespoke fish passage solutions in marine environments seem rare. As coastal development will increase in the future, it is imperative that we assess the potential connectivity issues resulting from marine infrastructure and that we generate solutions to mitigate these issues for marine organisms.

Attachments